Best Top Reviews Online

FTC’s Antitrust Case Against Qualcomm Goes To Trial Amid iPhone Bans In China And Germany

Friday is the trial date for the U.S. Federal Trade Commission’s antitrust case against Qualcomm, the outcome of which could have significant implications for Apple’s global legal battle with the chipmaker.

District Judge Lucy Koh will preside over the nonjury proceedings commencing in San Jose, California on Friday. Koh is well-known for her participation in tech industry lawsuits, including Apple’s infamous, multi-year conflict with Samsung.

In a lawsuit filed nearly two years ago, the FTC accuses Qualcomm of pressuring Apple into an exclusive modem chip deal from 2011 to 2016 in exchange for lower patent royalties. Qualcomm is frequently accused of not adhering to FRAND (fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory) pricing, despite holding a number of crucial smartphone-related patents.

Prior to the FTC action, Qualcomm had already been fined $853 million for similar practices in South Korea. Apple filed a $1 billion lawsuit against Qualcomm, accusing the company of withholding rebates in retaliation for cooperating with antitrust investigators.

Since then, governments in the United States, China, Taiwan, and Europe have investigated Qualcomm’s commercial transactions. The company avoided the majority of a fine in Taiwan by agreeing to invest $700 million in the country, but the European Union has fined it 997 million euros.

In the meantime, the private conflict between Apple and Qualcomm has only intensified, with lawsuits and countersuits being filed all over the world and Apple suppliers boycotting royalty payments. Qualcomm has accused Apple of patent infringement and the disclosure of trade secrets to rival chipmaker Intel, which is now the sole provider of iPhone modems.

Qualcomm was able to obtain limited iPhone bans in China and Germany at the conclusion of 2018, reversing Apple’s traditional advantage. Qualcomm has been unsuccessful in its efforts to obtain a U.S. injunction, which affects only older models. Apple has attempted to circumvent the Chinese ban by modifying iOS.

Legal battles may eventually force the two companies to reach a settlement. Qualcomm executives have even claimed that a deal could be reached within a matter of months, but as recently as late November, Apple stated that no negotiations were currently underway.

Why Trust Us?

Best Top Reviews Online was established in 2018 to provide our readers with detailed, truthful, and impartial advice on what to buy. We now have millions of monthly users from all over the world and annually evaluate over a thousand products.

The above article was written by the BestTopReviewsOnline team, which consists of some of the most knowledgeable technical experts in the United States. Our team consists of highly regarded writers with vast experience in smartphones, computer components, technology apps, security, and photography, among other fields.

Related Stories

  • All Post
  • Best Picks
  • Explainers
  • How To
  • News
  • Versus

Get more info



Best Products

Buying Guides

Contact Us

About Us

We provide a platform for our customers to rate and review services and products, as well as the stores that sell them. We research and compare the most popular brands and models before narrowing it down to the top ten, providing you with the most comprehensive and reliable buying advice to help you make your decision.

Disclaimer is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


Address & Map

20 S Santa Cruz Ave, Suite 300, Los Gatos, CA 95030, United States

© 2022 Pty. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. Licensing: All third-party trademarks, images, and copyrights used on this page are for comparative advertising, criticism, or review. As this is a public forum where users can express their opinions on specific products and businesses, the opinions expressed do not reflect those of