Best Top Reviews Online

Apple’s Market Cap Falls Below $2 Trillion As Investors Fear Additional Supply Chain Problems

Apple began 2023 with a market capitalization that has dropped below $2 trillion, a drastic change from the previous year when it reached $3 trillion.

Following early morning trading on Tuesday, Apple’s market capitalization fell from above $2 trillion to below $2 trillion. Apple’s stock price fell by more than 3.5% on Tuesday, bringing it to its lowest level since June 2021.

Apple was the first and only company to surpass $3 trillion in market capitalization on January 3, 2022, exactly one year ago. The drop to below $2 trillion represents a massive change in Apple’s fortunes. According to the Financial Times, despite losing 27% of its value in the past year, Apple is still performing better than its competitors, as the Nasdaq Composite lost 33%.

The decline, which may be temporary, is attributed to investor jitters after months of supply chain issues affected some of the company’s most popular and profitable products. Issues at the Zhengzhou factory in China have resulted in massive delays in the shipment of the iPhone 14 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro Max during a typically high sales period.

As the problems became apparent, analysts repeatedly predicted that shipments would decrease by millions of units, and consequently lowered their projections. Analysts now anticipate an 8% year-over-year decrease in quarterly net income.

China’s loosening of notoriously strict COVID restrictions, which led to an increase in lockdowns and infections, contributed to the problems. On Tuesday, it was reported that Apple had canceled orders for the majority of its products with Chinese component suppliers.

Tom Forte, an analyst at DA Davidson & Co., believes that the current state of COVID-19 in China will have the greatest impact on Apple’s operating results in 2023.

Despite the decline, Apple remains the most valuable tech company, followed by Microsoft with a market capitalization of $1.8 trillion.

Why Trust Us?

Best Top Reviews Online was established in 2018 to provide our readers with detailed, truthful, and impartial advice on what to buy. We now have millions of monthly users from all over the world and annually evaluate over a thousand products.

The above article was written by the BestTopReviewsOnline team, which consists of some of the most knowledgeable technical experts in the United States. Our team consists of highly regarded writers with vast experience in smartphones, computer components, technology apps, security, and photography, among other fields.

Related Stories

  • All Post
  • Best Picks
  • Explainers
  • How To
  • News
  • Versus
Analysts Pile On Apple After Revenue Forecast Miss

January 3, 2019

Since Apple revised its revenue guidance on Wednesday, analysts have been quick to weigh in on the lower-than-anticipated iPhone sales and primarily Chinese market-driven revenue declines. AppleInsider summarizes a selection of commentators’ statements. Apple issued a warning on Wednesday that…

Get more info



Best Products

Buying Guides

Contact Us

About Us

We provide a platform for our customers to rate and review services and products, as well as the stores that sell them. We research and compare the most popular brands and models before narrowing it down to the top ten, providing you with the most comprehensive and reliable buying advice to help you make your decision.

Disclaimer is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


Address & Map

20 S Santa Cruz Ave, Suite 300, Los Gatos, CA 95030, United States

© 2022 Pty. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. Licensing: All third-party trademarks, images, and copyrights used on this page are for comparative advertising, criticism, or review. As this is a public forum where users can express their opinions on specific products and businesses, the opinions expressed do not reflect those of